Experts Opinion on Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

0
66
Expert Opinion on chemotherapy for breast Cancer

Chemotherapy is a powerful treatment that involves taking medications to damage cancerous cells. The goal is to prevent these cells from dividing and multiplying, chemotherapy for breast cancer has been the option of many.

However, this article will be under listing the opinions of experts as to the benefits if there is, risks and side effects of chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Breast cancer remains a common and devastating disease amongst women that affects approximately 180,000 women in a specific geographical region and results in mortality.

If you have breast cancer, you seem to have more treatment options than ever before. Some take less time, are safer, and are easier on your body. Others target the specific glitch in your cells that allows cancer to survive or grow.

But no matter which one you and your doctor choose, the goal is the same, get rid of cancer so it doesn’t come back.

However, options like chemotherapy have become the mainstay, but it comes with a lot of baggage. Are you ready for it?

Is Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Worth the Risk?

Diving in-depth on the relationship between chemotherapy and breast cancers as well as the success rates of chemotherapy for breast cancer. A lot of studies and researches are available even when looking at the best options of surviving with both your mind and body healthy.

Obviously, different researchers, cancer specialists hold different opinions on the success rate of chemotherapy for breast cancer.

In this article, we will be looking at the different opinions in three segments:

  • The Opinions of the ‘YES’ Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
  • The Opinions of those on the Fence
  • Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Not the Best Option

The Opinions of the ‘YES’ Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

According to some cancer experts, chemotherapy is still the main treatment of most cancers including breast cancer. It’s saved millions of lives and for most cancer patients, still the best option.

Dr. Sumanta Pal, a urologic cancer specialist at the City of Hope cancer center in Duarte, California.

” I would say that in my practice, it’s still the majority that at some point in time will get chemotherapy”.

 Some doctors and researchers especially believe that so far, chemotherapy for breast cancer is a successful approach. Noting that despite the side effects and the aftermath of chemotherapy for breast cancer, that these side effects could be minimized by instigating a preventive nutrition strategy.

They concluded that if properly and judiciously applied could reduce the effect of the chemotherapeutic dose and improve the benefits of chemotherapy for breast cancer.

The Opinions of Those on The Fence

On the other hand, there are researchers who are of the opinion that they are not totally against chemotherapy for breast cancer but are also not overlooking the disadvantages, having noted that the success of chemotherapy for breast cancer could be improved and the side effects minimized by propagating a preventive nutrition strategy.

According to these researchers, if these nutritional measures are properly and judiciously applied, they could reduce the effect of the chemotherapeutic dose which destroys the immune system and leaves the body prone to other cancer cells and diseases.

However, this doesn’t take away the fact that chemotherapy for breast cancer leaves you with more problems to solve.

While some have taken into recognition the worrisome side effects of chemotherapy for breast cancer on the human immune system and the body as a whole.

Chemotherapy For Breast Cancer: Not The Best Option

 In an article of ascertaining why the success rate of chemotherapy is low, according to this expert, a retired scientist, Peter M Couttie clearly stated that chemotherapy is wrong in principle in that you are destroying the system of the body which fights cancer.

The body should be given the help it needs and not the other way round; the nutrients which are used by the body, iodine, selenium and ascorbic acid primarily and the lesser vitamins and minerals eg zinc, etc. We must remember that every vitamin and mineral needs about 20 others to work properly as an “assembly line” or chemical cascade uses many enzymes and every enzyme uses several different VMTE (vit. minerals, trace elements).

So, it is silly to try only one as the drug firms do look for a “magic bullet” Dr. Hoffer treated over a 1000 terminal cancer cases with natural nutrients especially ascorbate as it is the only one that can act alone and most animals make it in their livers, – except for us poor humans who suffer from that dreadful genetic liver enzyme disease, hypoascorbemia due to a mutation in our evolution. Dr. Hoffer’s results far exceeded chemotherapy. The latter, of course, is worth billions to the drug industry.

ODA of iodine and selenium should be used to prevent cancer and mega-dose sodium ascorbate to cure it.

 Katrine Schlie added that the problem is surely that many therapies were developed with xenograft models in immunocompromised mice, simply ignoring the impact of chemotherapy on the immune system. It is very important that during drug development people also take the effort to test their candidate in an immunocompetent model with murine tumors or in the humanized mouse.

The Risks and Aftermath of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Thousands of breast cancer patients are not even aware of the aftermath of chemotherapy, if they were, they would avoid it knowing that there is a risk of reoccurrence.

Chemotherapy for breast cancer is not the best and only shot for you to take and for every other type of cancer, in that what it does is to destroy the body’s immune system which in itself fights against cancer and other viruses detrimental to one’s health.

According to James Lembeck Trying to ‘broad brush’ treatment and survival stats is an impossible task because there are so many variables to take into account.

It is well known that cancer survival success, for the most part, uses a five-year survival rate as a benchmark. This doesn’t mean that cancer/s can’t recur after five years, as a matter of fact, it is quite common.

Many cancers can recur decades after first being discovered and treated, especially if radiation is also part of the treatment plan. And if it isn’t original cancer that was treated that comes back, it may be some other form.

Biochemical individuality, lifestyle, age and so many other environmental components all factor into your survival rate.

A study in 2005 looked into the survival rates of chemo patients, and the observations made showed that despite the use of single and new drugs with exorbitant prices, the chances of survival were very low and traumatic, thereby rendering chemotherapy for breast cancer an option which is unreliable and risky.

They also stated that “…in lung cancer, the median survival has increased by only 2 months [during the past 20 years, ed.] and an overall survival benefit of less than 5 percent has been achieved in the adjuvant treatment of breast, colon and head and neck cancers.”

It is also a known fact that chemotherapy suppresses the immune function and causes an enormous amount of systemic cellular damage, which in many cases the patient never recovers from. There is also the issue that chemotherapy has little or no effect on cancer stem cells. New research reveals that new cancer stem cells that have not been differentiated can multiply in spite of being exposed to chemotherapy.

Unfortunately, tumors can and do initially respond to chemotherapy, which leads to a false sense of hope. Using chemotherapy for breast cancer as part of the treatment plan can cause cancer to eventually become resistant to it. This can, and often does contribute to aggressive tumor progression.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy for breast cancer only makes our system weaker and vulnerable to other cancer growth and attacks in no distant time. The body should be given what it needs and not taking from it (chemo takes), nutrients that the body needs like iodine, selenium, and ascorbic acid primarily and the lesser vitamins and minerals.

Breast cancer in itself grows as a result of a weak immune system, why then do we cure evil with more loads of evil. Researches have shown that the majority of cancer patients who have gone through chemotherapy, go through health imbalances such as, infertility, development of other cancer cells, destruction of healthy cells which lead to fatigue, nausea.

Referring to James Lembeck the option of chemotherapy for breast cancer remains a deal-breaker, that because of politics, the insurance companies and the medical community’s lack of desire to think outside the box, will most likely not change any time soon if we do not take bold steps geared towards changing it ourselves.

Apparently, we need to look more into the long term effects of chemotherapy for breast cancer and think again before going the option of chemotherapy and it’s inabilities to ensure a healthy life for you now and in the nearest future and opt for ways with less damage.

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY